<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wall Blog &#187; social networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallblog.co.uk/tag/social-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Social, marketing, media : blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe fight myths with metrics in Marketing Cloud</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/02/11/adobe-fight-myths-with-metrics-in-marketing-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/02/11/adobe-fight-myths-with-metrics-in-marketing-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-time web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing and media spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral and buzz marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=38496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-38504 alignleft" title="Adobe Marketing Cloud BS detector" src="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2013/02/adobe-marketing-cloud-300x200.jpg" alt="Man wired up to Adobe's 'BS' detector to separate myths from metrics" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p><em>This post is provided by our partner Adobe</em></p>
<p>In their continuing fight to ride the wave of emerging technology and tame the data collected from social media, marketers have a new suite of tools to arm their brands with.</p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/02/11/adobe-fight-myths-with-metrics-in-marketing-cloud/" class="more-link">Read more on Adobe fight myths with metrics in Marketing Cloud&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/02/11/adobe-fight-myths-with-metrics-in-marketing-cloud/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/02/11/adobe-fight-myths-with-metrics-in-marketing-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Social Media Overkill!</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/the-social-media-overkill/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/the-social-media-overkill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam field</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/index.php?p=25399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-25400" src="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2012/03/images.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="208" /></p>
<p>I don’t know how many more times I can answer the same question from people. It usually goes something like this;</p>
<p>Social media wannabe: “Hey, are you on Pinterest yet?”</p>
<p>Me: “No! go away!”</p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/the-social-media-overkill/" class="more-link">Read more on The Social Media Overkill!&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/the-social-media-overkill/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/the-social-media-overkill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are your customers Pinterested?</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/20/are-your-customers-pinterested/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/20/are-your-customers-pinterested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom McCann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social CRM agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testify digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/index.php?p=25283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2012/03/PinterestBandwagon.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-25285" src="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2012/03/PinterestBandwagon.jpg" alt="" width="287" height="218" /></a>I’m going to try and not let this post fall into the trap of Pinterest-bashing as seems to be increasingly easy to do so these days. The inevitable backlash from Pinterest being the cool new kid on the block is in full swing, and for all the fawning, doe-eyed ‘Pinthusiasts’ clamoring to praise the site, and all the marketers running round like headless chickens trying to discover how best to use it for selling stuff, there’s the growing band of dissenters taking the contrary opinion.<span id="more-25283"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/20/are-your-customers-pinterested/" class="more-link">Read more on Are your customers Pinterested?&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/20/are-your-customers-pinterested/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/03/20/are-your-customers-pinterested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in Search&#8230; Plus Your World</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/13/the-week-in-search-plus-your-world/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/13/the-week-in-search-plus-your-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/index.php?p=23170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google has started the year by encouraging us to take more notice of our friends while simultaneously upsetting some of its other &#60;cough&#62; &#8216;friends&#8217;.</p>
<p>The launch of <a href="http://www.google.com/insidesearch/plus.html" target="_blank">Search Plus Your World</a> on Tuesday makes sense of some of the moves we&#8217;ve seen over the past few months, notably the creation of the Google+ network and encrypted search via SSL connections.<span id="more-23170"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/13/the-week-in-search-plus-your-world/" class="more-link">Read more on The week in Search&#8230; Plus Your World&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/13/the-week-in-search-plus-your-world/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/13/the-week-in-search-plus-your-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s What Do You Love highlights its products &#8211; and a gaping hole</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/06/28/googles-what-do-you-love-highlights-its-products-and-a-gaping-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/06/28/googles-what-do-you-love-highlights-its-products-and-a-gaping-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Whitehead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDYL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Do You Love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=15011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_15013" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2011/06/Screen-shot-2011-06-28-at-12.51.10.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15013" src="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2011/06/Screen-shot-2011-06-28-at-12.51.10-300x226.png" alt="" width="300" height="226" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What Do You Love: Google wants to know</p></div>
<p>Google has quietly launched a new website called What Do You Love, highlighting the many, many products it offers (and, inadvertently, the ones it doesn’t).</p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/06/28/googles-what-do-you-love-highlights-its-products-and-a-gaping-hole/" class="more-link">Read more on Google&#8217;s What Do You Love highlights its products &#8211; and a gaping hole&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/06/28/googles-what-do-you-love-highlights-its-products-and-a-gaping-hole/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/06/28/googles-what-do-you-love-highlights-its-products-and-a-gaping-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tipping the backlash: The Malcolm Gladwell Book Generator</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/02/08/tipping-the-backlash-the-malcolm-gladwell-book-generator/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/02/08/tipping-the-backlash-the-malcolm-gladwell-book-generator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>@gordonmacmillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Gladwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=11074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you do folks don&#8217;t hack off the internet. Look at the <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/02/04/gladwell-proves-too-much/" target="_blank">the backlash</a> that came Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s way following his <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell" target="_blank">New Yorker piece on why &#8220;the revolution will not be tweeted&#8221;</a>, which was dismissive of effect that social media can have on protest movements such as those recently seen in Egypt and Tunisia.</p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/02/08/tipping-the-backlash-the-malcolm-gladwell-book-generator/" class="more-link">Read more on Tipping the backlash: The Malcolm Gladwell Book Generator&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/02/08/tipping-the-backlash-the-malcolm-gladwell-book-generator/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/02/08/tipping-the-backlash-the-malcolm-gladwell-book-generator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Facebook film not to be promoted on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/07/09/new-facebook-film-not-to-be-promoted-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/07/09/new-facebook-film-not-to-be-promoted-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallblog.co.uk/?p=3406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wallblog.co.uk/wp-content/files/2010/07/SocialNetwork090710.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3411" src="http://www.wallblog.co.uk/wp-content/files/2010/07/SocialNetwork090710-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>In  ironic but sadly unsurprising news <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100707/the-facebook-movie-will-not-be-using-facebook-to-market-the-facebook-movie-online/" target="_blank">Boom Town have confirmation</a> from Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group that Facebook will not be used to promote David Fincher&#8217;s new film The Social Network that depicts the early days of, you guessed it, Facebook.<span id="more-3406"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/07/09/new-facebook-film-not-to-be-promoted-on-facebook/" class="more-link">Read more on New Facebook film not to be promoted on Facebook&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/07/09/new-facebook-film-not-to-be-promoted-on-facebook/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/07/09/new-facebook-film-not-to-be-promoted-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eModeration Social Media Round-Up #41</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tia Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand marketing campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Fan Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Open Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing to teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media round-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenage online behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/tiafisher/archive/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to eModeration&#8217;s round-up of all that is intriguing, alarming<br />
 or odd in the world of social media, compiled by Kate Williams. For<br />
more social media snippets, follow @emodkate &#8211; or for general twittery,<br />
@KateVWilliams.</p>
<p>This week (a little bleary-eyed): The Social Election; Facebook&#8217;s fork<br />
in the road; and Apple redux.</p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41/" class="more-link">Read more on eModeration Social Media Round-Up #41&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/07/emoderation-social-media-round-up-41/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eModeration&#8217;s Social Media Round-Up #40</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tia Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand marketing campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Fan Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Open Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online social media campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media round-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenage online behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual worlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/tiafisher/archive/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">Welcome<br />
 to eModeration&#8217;s round-up of all that is intriguing, alarming or odd in<br />
 the world of social media, compiled by Kate Williams. For more social<br />
media snippets, follow @emodkate &#8211; or for general twittery,<br />
@KateVWilliams.</p>
<p>This week (a little later than usual, due to an unpleasant encounter<br />
with The Lurgy): is Facebook sucking out our brains?; Google fumbles<br />
&#8216;evil&#8217;; and more Apple fun.</span></span> </p>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="headlines" class="" name="headlines">THE HEADLINES &#8230;</a></b></span></div>
<p>
The social world is still blinking anxiously as it attempts to digest<br />
the full import of<b><span style="font-size: large"> Facebook</span></b>&#8216;s recent announcements at <b>F8</b> (the<br />
annual, erm, FaceFest, during which the &#8216;Book traditionally tells<br />
mortals what to expect during the coming year.) </p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bBLTV-HeI/AAAAAAAAAUc/aMBWGurFMuM/s1600/chip_on_spiders_web.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bBLTV-HeI/AAAAAAAAAUc/aMBWGurFMuM/s200/chip_on_spiders_web.jpg" width="200" border="0" height="158"/></a>What it all boils down to is<br />
this: Facebook, within an unspecified period of time, will be<br />
transitioning from being an <span style="font-style: italic">element</span><br />
 of the web – albeit one with a fair amount of heft and a considerable<br />
social girth – to actually, like, <span style="font-style: italic">being</span><br />
 the web. </p>
<p>I know. There is so <span style="font-style: italic">very</span> much<br />
to think about there that we thought the subject deserved<b> a blog post<br />
 of its own</b> &#8211; so if you wish to scare yourself silly reading about<br />
the new, Matrix-like Facebook,read it <span style="font-size: large"><a href="/blogs/tiafisher/archive/2010/04/27/facebook-s-like-and-open-graph-a-digest-of-the-indigestable.aspx"><b>here</b></a><span style="font-size: small">, for a digest of what, at times, has been<br />
the rather indigestable coverage.</span></span></p>
<p></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bTUM2n15I/AAAAAAAAAVE/iYSoAnX0ix0/s1600/google_tibet.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bTUM2n15I/AAAAAAAAAVE/iYSoAnX0ix0/s320/google_tibet.jpg" width="320" border="0" height="237"/></a></div>
<p>
Talking of evil (and we might have been) &#8211; here is <span style="font-size: large"><b>Google</b></span>  -<br />
 the original ‘do no evil’ guys – following up their<b> phased<br />
withdrawal from China</b> by <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-content-and-free.html">posting</a><br />
 what it called a ‘refresher’ to its censorship policies. The global<br />
searchmeisters are simultaneously launching what they call a <b>Government<br />
 Requests Tool</b>, which will allow anyone to discover the extent to<br />
which <b>governments are using their legal systems to ask about <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/apr/22/google-internet-freedom-privacy">their<br />
 citizens’ web activity</a>,</b> or to <b>censor content legally<br />
available elsewhere</b> (Britain, by the way, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7615143/Google-had-1200-requests-for-data-from-British-authorities.html">ranks<br />
 third</a> – only Brazil and the US were more active). </p>
<p>It’s all very admirable: it stakes out <b>Google’s position on the human<br />
 rights ma</b>p, and goes some way to answering those critics who<br />
accused it of inconsistency in singling out China, in a fit of<br />
libertarian evangelism.</p>
<p>Rather awkwardly, however, the announcement was made in the same week<br />
that<b> a group of 10 nations wrote <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/sKnyDMqbhvs/">an<br />
open letter</a></b> to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, expressing their serious<br />
 concerns about the company’s attitude to individuals&#8217; rights to privacy<br />
 – most notably the “<b>disappointing disregard for fundamental privacy<br />
norms and laws” displayed during the rollout of Google Buzz.</b></p>
<p><b>Google Street View</b> also came in for sustained <b>criticism from<br />
the privacy tsars</b> &#8211; and then came under further fire from Germany’s<br />
Federal Commissioner for Data Protection, who professed himself ‘<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/google_streetview_logs_wlans/">appalled<br />
 and horrified</a>’ to discover that the <b>Street View car is scanning<br />
private wireless networks and unique Mac (Media Access Control)<br />
addresses</b>, as it wends its merry way through Germany’s bergs.  The<br />
commissioner calls this ‘unlawfully collected personal data’ and urges<br />
Google to <b>delete it immediately.</b></p>
<p>This evil thing?  It’s tricky, darnit. </p>
<p>
<span style="font-size: large"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="juice" class="" name="juice">APPLE JUICE &#8230;</a></span></p>
<p>For a famously<b> controlling and security-conscious company</b> to<b><br />
lose one next-gen prototype devi</b>ce may be considered a misfortune.<b><br />
 To lose two</b>  &#8211; well, you can probably see where I’m going with<br />
this. </p>
<p>Astonishingly, what appeared to be two<span> </span><b><span>iPod</span> touch prototypes</b> – fully camera’d-up, Touch-fans<br />
 &#8211; <b>popped up on eBay</b> at the end of last week, and were spotted by<br />
 and eagle-eyed 9to5Mac just before the auction was taken down. </p>
<p>Could be a hoax, for sure, but the pre-existence of an <b>Apple patent<br />
for an iPod Touch with camera</b> &#8211; plus the fact that the latest Touch<br />
3G was found to contain <a href="http://www.techtree.com/India/News/New_iPod_Touch_Dismantled/551-106300-893.html">an<br />
 empty space for a camera</a> &#8211;  would suggest that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5523590/what-are-these-camera+fied-ipod-touch-prototypes-doing-on-ebay">Apple<br />
 really IS that careless</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, hapless Apple engineer Gray Powell, <b>who lost the</b><span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange"> iPhone</span></b></span><br />
 prototype in a Bavarian-themed bar, has been contacted by <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5522045/apple-iphone-misplacer-offered-free-trip-to-germany">those<br />
 wags at Lufthansa</a>: they wrote offering him a free business-class<br />
round-trip to Munich for an authentic Bier Keller experience &#8211; an offer<br />
which we sincerely hope he doesn’t have the unexpected leisure to pursue<br />
 any time soon. Gray’s father told CNET that his son was <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20003021-261.html">‘devastated’</a><br />
 by his mistake; it’s profoundly to be hoped that the fact that the poor<br />
 guy’s name is now in the public domain will protect him from a<br />
precipitous P45.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bGizBQ7jI/AAAAAAAAAU8/MaRiueppfqo/s1600/apple-gizmodo-iphone-4g.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bGizBQ7jI/AAAAAAAAAU8/MaRiueppfqo/s320/apple-gizmodo-iphone-4g.jpg" border="0"/></a></div>
<p>And what of<b> Gizmodo</b>, the site which paid<br />
$5000 for the ‘lost’ iPhone HD, and garnered publicity at least twenty<br />
times that value in return, in the form of an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/business/media/26carr.html">extra<br />
 3.6 million eyeballs</a>? Well, the <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/criminal-charges-possible-in-the-case-of-the-lost-iphone/?ref=business">New<br />
 York Times</a> says California authorities are weighing up whether or<br />
not to slam a felony charge on Nick Denton, boss of Gizmodo’s parent<br />
company Gawker Media &#8211; and it now emerges that on Friday, officers from<br />
California’s <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/iphone-raid/#ixzz0mHnsO8YK">Rapid<br />
 Enforcement Allied Computer Team</a> raided the house of Gizmodo editor<br />
 Jason Chen and sequestered computer equipment.</p>
<p><a href="http://srph.it/9q4EV7%20">DailyFinance.com</a> urges Apple to<br />
launch a suit &#8211; according to them, the company has a super-tight civil<br />
case that <b>Gawker pilfered their trade secrets</b>, inflicting<br />
millions of dollars-worth of damage.  And, with Apple’s <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/node/16117">Q2 figures</a> revealing that<br />
8.75 million iPhones were sold last quarter, it’s a fair bet they’ll be<br />
taking that advice pretty seriously.</p>
<p>The whole sorry episode has had the unintended side-effect of shining a<br />
very bright spotlight on <b>Apple’s legendary secrecy</b>, and the<br />
ethics behind it.  Apple thus far has kept an adamantine grip on its new<br />
 products, and vigorously pursued a strategy of strict control over<br />
which members of the tech press are allowed advance access to them.  And<br />
 &#8211; as Gizmodo say <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520746/apple-didnt-leak-the-iphoneand-why-that-matters">in<br />
 their own defence</a> &#8211; ‘it&#8217;s impossible to argue that &#8220;access<br />
journalism&#8221; has anything but a deleterious effect on the objectivity of<br />
journalists.’</p>
<p>Sounds like it really is <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/BWTg0DuZrbM/">all<br />
over between Adobe and Apple</a> &#8211; in the tech equivalent of ‘collecting<br />
 their stuff’, <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Adobe</span></b></span> have announced their intention to <b>halt<br />
 development of their Flash-to-iPhone converter</b>, and are calling on<br />
their community of app developers to concentrate entirely on Android<br />
devices from now on.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in the continuing saga of AppleStore’s rejection of ‘adult’<br />
apps,<b> CEO Steve Jobs</b> has fired off another of the quickfire<br />
emails he’s lately been so fond of sending to correspondents. “We do<br />
believe we have a moral responsibility to<b> keep porn off the iPhone</b>,”<br />
 <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/19/steve-jobs-android-porn/#ixzz0mDek4lcR">he<br />
 told one</a>. “Folks who want porn can buy and [sic] Android phone.“</p>
<p><b>The AppStore’</b>s decision-making process recently came under<br />
scrutiny when it emerged that <b>an app by a Pullitzer-Prize winning<br />
cartoonist had been rejected</b> by the increasingly capricious tech<br />
giant &#8211; on the <span style="font-style: italic">very</span><br />
questionable grounds that it contained &#8220;content that ridicules public<br />
figures.&#8221;  In <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/steve-jobs-says-apple-made-a-mistake-in-rejecting-pulitzer-winners-app/">another<br />
 of those emails</a>, Jobs was forced to acknowledge that the rejection<br />
had been a mistake &#8211; <b>the app was subsequently accepted.</b></p>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="lowdown" class="" name="lowdown">THE LOWDOWN &#8230;</a></b></span></div>
<p>
Anonymous reviews seem consistently to be in the news – and the Guardian<br />
 reports on a rather <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/18/amazon-orlando-figes-books">astonishing<br />
 literary whodunit</a> within the notoriously back-stabby academic<br />
community.  Historian<b> Dr Rachel Polonsky</b> noticed that <b>an<br />
anonymous commenter on Amazon had slated her recent book</b> – and that<br />
other leading academics had suffered similar attacks.  One of the<br />
pseudonyms of the spiteful critic – orlando-birkbeck – led (perhaps<br />
inevitably) to the door of Prof Orlando Figes, 50, a historian at<br />
Birkbeck College, who responded with legal threats to both his<br />
colleagues and the media.  In a surprise twist, the professor’s<br />
barrister wife at first came tearfully forwards to claim responsibility;<br />
 thence to the final denouement, in which the Professor did the manly<br />
thing and acknowledged that <b>the poison-pen writer was, in fact,<br />
himself.</b></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bVB2YjOII/AAAAAAAAAVM/I_m2qi1urEE/s1600/Hitler+downfall.JPG"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bVB2YjOII/AAAAAAAAAVM/I_m2qi1urEE/s320/Hitler+downfall.JPG" border="0"/></a></div>
<p>Ach, what would we have done without that most<br />
enjoyable <span style="font-size: large"><b>YouTub</b><b><span style="color: orange">e</span></b></span> memes of the last year &#8211; the<br />
 re-subtitling of the film ‘<b><span style="font-size: large"><span style="color: orange">Downfall</span></span></b>’, which depicts<br />
Hitler’s desperate final hours, so that the Fuhrer appears to be having a<br />
 hissy-fit about any old tripe.  Now, though, the film’s grumpy<br />
producers are <b>using YouTube’s Content ID system,</b> which permits a<br />
copyright owner to <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/everyone-who-s-made-hitler-parody-leave-room">immediately<br />
 disable</a> any video that contains its copyrighted content, to <b>remove<br />
 them all</b>!  Interestingly, <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/Giyqe8KvCvY/">YouTube<br />
 is advising</a> that the parodists claim ‘fair use’, which would<br />
immediately restore the videos and force the film&#8217;s producers to issue<br />
an official DMCA takedown notice.  With delightful predictability, some<br />
wag has uploaded a Downfall <a href="http://vimeo.com/11086952">parody<br />
about the parody</a> controversy. So <span style="font-style: italic">clever</span>,<br />
 these postmodernists.</p>
<p>Twitterista’s<br />
 are <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/22/twitter-nick-clegg-newspaper-swipe">constitutionally<br />
 disinclined</a> to trust the mainstream media, a fact confirmed last<br />
week by the trending hashtag #nickcleggsfault, which predicted that a<br />
panicked right-wing press would try to smear LibDem leader Nick Clegg,<br />
following his surge in the polls.  By midday on Wednesday it was the<br />
second most-tweeted hashtag on Twitter, with ‘fake tan went wrong &#8211;<br />
#nickcleggsfault’ and ‘dinosaurs extinct &#8211; #nickcleggsfault’ among the<br />
sniggeriest &#8211; along with the inevitable ‘lost 4th-gen iPhone prototype -<br />
 #nickcleggsfault’.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bVo0hJaxI/AAAAAAAAAVU/r15aHo24YXM/s1600/nick+clegg.JPG"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bVo0hJaxI/AAAAAAAAAVU/r15aHo24YXM/s320/nick+clegg.JPG" border="0"/></a></div>
<p>
And, in further weighty political news, ‘Poor’ <b>George Osborne</b> &#8211;<br />
or rather, the hair of the same &#8211; became a trending topic this week: his<br />
 new brilliantined and Bunteresque ‘Do was the subject of much mockery<br />
during the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/iainmartin/2010/04/21/cable-mauled-in-chancellors-debate-but-questions-for-osborne-over-his-hair/">Chancellors&#8217;<br />
 Debate</a>.  The Shadow Chancellor&#8217;s decision to risk a &#8216;Lord Snooty&#8217;<br />
was all the more puzzling since &#8211; as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/apr/22/george-osborne-stylewatch-hair">the<br />
 Guardian</a> pointed out &#8211;  it ‘can only add to the vague but<br />
unshakeable sense of a man who has just had his jacket buttoned up by<br />
his nanny.’</p>
<p>A month or so ago, <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Marmite</span></b></span> launched a rather smart<br />
 social media campaign which pitted the imaginary Marmitophile Love<br />
party against the <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&#38;source=web&#38;oi=video_result&#38;cad=229406365991518920&#38;ct=res&#38;cd=1&#38;ved=0CAgQtwIwAA&#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DAy8D39ojQsg&#38;ei=CarWS9P1KtKmOOfIkdIG&#38;usg=AFQjCNGzTXaLjIp8oVKDHQe0sRZvTRw4Bw&#38;sig2=_-AfaaOAMSbaZXz3_DnY5w">Marmite-loathing<br />
 Hate party</a>.  The leader of the Hate party was oleaginous and a bit<br />
thick &#8211; though I&#8217;m sure this had nothing to do with BNP leader <b>Nick<br />
Griffin&#8217;s conclusion that he was being parodied.</b>  Aaanyways, in a<br />
revenge which can reasonably be described as ‘spectacularly childish’, <b>a<br />
 floating Marmite jar was superimposed upon the BNP’s recent party<br />
political broadcast</b>, causing<span style="font-size: large"><b> Unilever</b></span> to <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/998759/Unilever-takes-legal-action-against-BNP-Marmite-stunt/">initiate<br />
 injunction proceedings</a> in order to protect the integrity of their<br />
brand.</p>
<p>The Round-up was rather purse-lipped about the freak-show frisson which<br />
accompanied <span style="font-size: large"><b>Susan<br />
 Boyle</b></span>’s sudden elevation  &#8211; we felt that it reflected rather<br />
 poorly on our national culture.  But it seems that a model has been<br />
established, without which popular culture will grind to a halt. We<br />
therefore present to you the dual viral delights of portly Lin Yu Chun<br />
from Taiwan, who turns out to have a rather sweet voice, and who <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/jx5jAdBcoqY/">here</a><br />
 <b>duets Bonnie Tyler’s “Total Eclipse of the Heart” with William<br />
Shatner</b>.</p>
<p>See, this is the kind of <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/pi8sJ8F3xHE/">grit<br />
and vigour</a> which you’d expect from an alliance between doughty<br />
Britain and perseverant Australia. Brit Sean Murtagh and Aussie Natalie<br />
Mead were unable to get back to the UK in time for their own wedding –<br />
but were not ones to let the small matter of a volcanic eruption disrupt<br />
 their nuptuals. They invited their fellow stranded passengers to join<br />
them in <b>celebrating their wedding at Dubai’s airport</b>, while their<br />
 official guests, assembled in the UK, watched the <b>romantic union via<br />
 Skype</b>.  Tears? Good lord no &#8211;  just a little ash in my eye, is all.</p>
<p>In related volcanic news: few would deny that here’s been a bit of<br />
argy-bargy about the <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">iPad</span></b></span>’s usefulness, but no-one<br />
has thus far suggested that ‘<b>government of medium-sized Scandiwegian<br />
country</b>’ should be <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/SsvlRJS8wII/">amongst<br />
 its functionalities</a>.  Nevertheless, Norwegian Prime Minister Jens<br />
Stoltenberg, who was grounded last week by that pesky Icelandic<br />
eruption, was reported by his press secretary to be “<b>running the<br />
Norwegian government from the United States via his new iPad</b>.” </p>
<p>Still unconvinced that the iPad is a Good Thing?  Gah &#8211; the global<br />
supply of kitten/toddler/iPad interaction videos is running dry!  Will<br />
this<b> <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/Jn8W4UGEVN4/">great-grandma-gets-an-iPad</a><br />
 video</b> do instead? </p>
<p>Apparently there are now <b>8.6 million robots in the world</b> — or, as<br />
 <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/industrial-robots/041410-world-robot-population">IEEE.org<br />
 reports</a>, more than one automaton for every person in Austria.  As a<br />
 contextualising device, I confess that leaves me none the wiser – you?</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bf7S11HmI/AAAAAAAAAVc/udf90v8ELWE/s1600/robot.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bf7S11HmI/AAAAAAAAAVc/udf90v8ELWE/s320/robot.jpg" width="240" border="0" height="320"/></a></div>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="newsbytes" class="" name="newsbytes">NEWSBYTES &#8230;</a></span></div>
<p>
New documents filed in a suit against Pennsylvania’s Lower Merrion<br />
School District allege that <b>cameras embedded in school laptops</b><br />
took <b><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/04/suit-claims-web-cam-on-school-laptops-took-1000s-of-secret-photos-of-students/1">‘thousands’<br />
 of unauthorized images</a></b> of their pupils in their own homes. One<br />
student says that his laptop took photos of him as he slept &#8211; and<br />
according to court papers, one staff member described the images as a<br />
window &#8220;into a little LMSD soap opera.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>More teens are texting</b>, and they’re texting more often: <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#38;art_aid=126527">new<br />
 research from Pew</a> reports that 54% of  American teenagers send<br />
daily texts, up from 38% 18 months before. 72% of them text regularly<br />
overall.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a new study reveals that <b>younger users care very much<br />
about <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100415/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_young_adults_privacy">online<br />
 privacy</a>;</b> quite as much as we Oldies.  Overall, 88% of us have<br />
withheld information from business due to privacy concerns, with a<br />
comparable figure of 82% for young adults. 84% of them feel that<br />
permission should be gained from the subjects of a video or photo,<br />
before it’s posted online – only 2% lower than the overall figure. And –<br />
 most pertinently for Facebook and other companies who have recently<br />
been trumpeting the ‘end of privacy’ – 40% of 18-24s believe execs<br />
should face prison for their company’s illegal use of personal info –<br />
exactly matching the figure for 35-to-44-year-olds.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large"><b>Microsoft</b></span><br />
 have been accused of <b><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/microsoft/7597384/Microsoft-in-sexting-row-over-Kin-advert.html">encouraging<br />
 sexting</a></b> with a promo video for its Kin phones – pitched as<br />
social devices allowing easy sharing of content with friends – which<br />
shows a teenage boy sending a photo of his bare torso to a female<br />
friend. Critics say that the company is<b> aiming the devices at 13-18<br />
year olds </b>– and recent research found that one in four in this age<br />
group have admitted sending explicit images to their friends.</p>
<p>The Telegraph reports that <b>Microsoft is under further fire</b>,<br />
following accusations that <b>a Chinese factory which makes Xbox<br />
components is <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/microsoft/7597344/Microsoft-accused-of-using-teenage-slave-labour-to-build-Xboxes-in-China.html">using<br />
 teenagers as slave labour</a></b>. They quote an investigation by the<br />
US’s National Labour Committee, which found that the factory was paying<br />
its young workers as little as 37p per hour for 15-hour shifts in<br />
desperately crowded workshops. One space, measuring 105ft by 105ft,<br />
contained nearly <b>a thousand teenagers working in 86 degree heat</b> -<br />
 the factory is alleged to have turned on the air-conditioning only when<br />
 foreign clients were visiting. </p>
<p>A<b> new virus has infected the PCs of thousands of Japanese users</b><br />
who have <b>illegally downloaded sexually-explicit hentai</b>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8622665.stm">according to<br />
the BBC</a>.  The malware takes a screenshot of the victim’s web history<br />
 and publishes it – before demanding a £10 fee to ‘settle your violation<br />
 of copyright law’ and remove the user’s surfing history.</p>
<p>The <span style="font-size: large"><b>Conservative<br />
 Party</b></span> has weighed in on the current controversy surrounding <b>Facebook’s<br />
 refusal to install a ‘panic button’</b>, which would connect young<br />
users directly to the police if they felt at threat from paedophiles.<br />
The party is <b><a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Digitalmarketing/News/997845/Tories-threaten-pull-advertising-Facebook/">threatening<br />
 to remove</a> their advertising</b> unless Facebook reconsiders – but<br />
critics accuse the Tories of electioneering, pointing out that Facebook,<br />
 which is <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/03/02/facebook-made-up-to-700-million-in-2009-on-track-towards-1-1-billion-in-2010/">on-track<br />
 to make $1.1 Billion</a> in 2010, is unlikely to be overly-worried by<br />
their threats.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large"><b>Rolling Stone<br />
magazine</b></span> has announced that it will be <b>erecting <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/997785/Rolling-Stone-puts-paywall-website/">a<br />
 Glasto-style paywall</a></b> around all content beyond its homepage.<br />
The iconic muso-mag will tax readers $3.95 for a month’s pass,  or<br />
$29.99 for an annual subscription.  Elsewhere, Reuters announced that it<br />
 too is eyeing a limit to Free, and perhaps <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Digitalmarketing/News/997956/Reuters-overhaul-website-hints-charging-content/">plans<br />
 to charge</a> for “niche, high-value content&#8221;, according to Brand<br />
Republic. </p>
<p>The <b>Wall Street Journal has joined the New York Times in <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/-jAeQgYp4Ks/">cuddling<br />
 up to Foursquare</a></b>:  it’s now providing them with editorial<br />
snippets and restaurant reviews, as well as three new badges, each of<br />
which come with a specific New York Challenge. </p>
<p>It was perhaps inevitable that <b>News Corp</b> would throw its hat into<br />
 the social gaming ring, and last week it <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-news-corp.-buys-social-gamer-irata-labs/">planted<br />
 its flag</a> with the<b> acquisition of social game developer Irata<br />
Labs</b>. It seems there are <b>no plans to fold the company into<br />
MySpace</b> &#8211; it will be grown as a standalone, to be put to work with<br />
NewsCorp properties as required.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the L.A.Times reports that <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Hulu</span></b></span>, the video-site<br />
part-owned by NewsCorp, <b>might be launching its subscription model</b><br />
 at <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/04/hulu-pushes-forward-with-995-subscription-service.html">$9.95<br />
 a month</a>.  But at least <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100422/why-10-a-month-for-hulu-is-too-much-and-too-little/">one<br />
 commentator</a> has noted that the figure might not be quite the ticket<br />
 &#8211; being both too much for the average consumer to stomach for free TV,<br />
and too little to make much of a dent in Hulu’s operating costs.</p>
<p>New research by moneysupermarket.com suggests that <b>superfast<br />
broadband will actively <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/april/superfast-broadband-2018will-encourage-illegal">encourage<br />
 users to illegally download</a> copyrighted content</b>.  Already,<br />
nearly a fifth of internet users admit to doing so – and 35% will be<br />
more inclined to, once superfast broadband is rolled out. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Yahoo</span></b></span><br />
 has splashed out on the <b>Montenegran Me.me</b> domain name for its<br />
micro-blogging site <b>Meme</b>, calling the purchase “<b>an essential<br />
component of our online branding strategy</b>.” <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-yahoo-buys-the-me.me-domain-for-its-twitter-like-microblogging-site/">Commentators<br />
 predict</a> that a wider roll-out of the surprisingly underpublicized<br />
Twitter rival is in the pipeline; <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-buys-me-me-domain-for-its-twitter-style-yahoo-meme/20256/">Search<br />
 Engine Journal</a> further notes that Yahoo’s fortunes appear to have<br />
turned. Citing improved ad spend and increased earnings in Q1 2010, the<br />
journal wonders what else the company might have up its sleeve.  </p>
<p></p>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="stats" class="" name="stats">SOCIAL STATS &#8230;</a></span></div>
<p>
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_1838525195">N</a><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#38;art_aid=126308">ew<br />
 research</a> finds that a vast <b>6.8% of all the URLs accessed by<br />
businesses belong to Facebook</b>, with <b>10% of businesses’ bandwidth<br />
eaten up by YouTube</b>. “IT managers are right to be concerned about<br />
the amount of social network use at work,&#8221; says Network Box’s Simon<br />
Heron. Well, quite. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Facebook</span></b></span><b> is responsible <a href="http://feeds.businesswire.com/click.phdo?i=45ff4a0c8e1b0d48339dcf627acfcfef">for<br />
 nearly 50%</a> of global hits to websites from social media</b>, with <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Twitter</span></b></span><br />
 punching above its weight in <b>generating nearly one in ten</b>.  <b>StumbledUpon</b><br />
 sits in between, with<b> just under 25%</b>, according to StatCounter.</p>
<p>In the States, <b>145 million Internet users access social web<br />
applications</b>,  between them generating nearly <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/socialmediabiz-feed/%7E3/ZFRDBDg1kXA/500-billion-impressions-16-of-users-generate-majority-of-brand-impressions-social-media-sit">500<br />
 billion impressions</a> on each other. A new report by Forrester also<br />
finds that a  mahoosive 80% of those impressions are generated by 16% of<br />
 web users – and more than 60% of them come via Facebook.</p>
<p>And a <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/april/half-of-mobile-users-to-pay-via-phone-by-2014">new<br />
 report predicts</a> that <b>nearly half of global mobile users will be<br />
using their devices to pay for both digital and physical goods by 2014.</b></p>
<p>Finally, <b><a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/PublicRelations/News/997509/Bellwether-reports-spending-first-time-ten-quarters/">ad<br />
 budgets are on the rise</a></b> for the first time in ten consecutive<br />
quarters, according to the latest Bellwether report.</p>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><b><br />
</b></span></div>
<div style="color: orange"><span style="font-size: large"><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=7775086736306723629" title="brands" class="" name="brands">BRANDS GET SOCIAL &#8230;</a></b></span></div>
<p>
Supermarket giant <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Asda</span></b></span>, who recently signed up to Mumsnet’s<br />
Let Girls Be Girls campaign, has<b> <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Digitalmarketing/News/997842/Asda-calls-Mumsnet-approve-kids-clothes/">consulted<br />
 Mumsnet users</a></b> about whether one of their products was against<br />
the spirit of the campaign, which calls on retailers<b> not to sell<br />
products which prematurely sexualise children</b>.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;text-align: center"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bgneUCN9I/AAAAAAAAAVk/1DES2Nl7s-U/s1600/coca+cola+ocean.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S9bgneUCN9I/AAAAAAAAAVk/1DES2Nl7s-U/s200/coca+cola+ocean.jpg" width="200" border="0" height="158"/></a></div>
<p>As part of their<a href="http://www.dmnews.com/coca-cola-kicks-off-social-media-earth-day-effort-with-ocean-conservancy/article/167963/"><br />
 Live Positively</a> campaign, <b><span style="font-size: large"><span style="color: orange">Coca-Cola</span></span> is teaming up with the<br />
charity Ocean Conservancy</b> to encourage their fans to ‘oceanize’<br />
their Facebook profile image into a playful underwater photo.</p>
<p>
And the brand has also <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Advertising/News/997545/Coca-Cola-kicks-off-World-Cup-celebration-campaign/">kicked<br />
 off</a> its <b>World Cup celebration campaign</b> with an ad which<br />
stars former Cameroon star Roger Milla, famous for celebrating a goal<br />
during Italy’s ’90 World Cup with enthusiastic on-pitch dancing.  The<br />
ads direct users to the brand’s YouTube channel, where they’re urged to<br />
upload their own celebratory videos.</p>
<p>Meanwhile,<span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange"> PepsiCo</span></b></span> and <span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">Microsoft’s World Cup</span></b></span> campaign<br />
 features Lionel Messi and Frank Lampard, and<b> an interactive game<br />
called <a href="http://www.commercetuned.co.uk/news/microsoft-and-pepsico-launch-ad-campaign-to-kick-off-world-cup-090.php">Football<br />
 Hero</a></b> in which users can earn personalised video content, to be<br />
distributed via their social media profiles.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large"><b>Tesco</b></span><br />
 has launched its <b><a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/998441/Tesco-launches-first-foray-social-networking-Race-Life/">Race<br />
 For Life social networking site</a></b> – the brand’s first. It gives<br />
those brave souls who are participating in Cancer Research UK&#8217;s annual<br />
fund-raising run a dedicated space to share their experiences with their<br />
 fellow-runners.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large"><b>Shreddies</b></span><br />
 is crowdsourcing <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Digitalmarketing/News/997905/Shreddies-looks-recruit-Nana-social-media-campaign/">their<br />
 latest campaign</a> – they need to <b>find a new Knitting Nana</b> to<br />
be the face of their brand.  Meanwhile, Unilever is asking the public <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/998122/Unilever-crowdsource-content-13-global-brands/">to<br />
 create ads</a> for some of its best-known brands, including Lynx, Ben<br />
&#38; Jerry&#8217;s, Dove and Vaseline. </p>
<p>Finally,<span style="color: orange;font-size: large"><b> Scholastic</b></span>,<br />
 publishers of <span style="font-size: large"><b><a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/april/scholastic-creates-virtual-world-for-horrible">Horrible<br />
 Histories</a></b></span> &#8211; the gruesome reading-matter of choice for<br />
under-12s everywhere – are working with our social media agency partners<br />
 <a href="http://www.yomego.com/"><span style="font-size: large"><b><span style="color: orange">YoMego</span></b></span></a> to build a<br />
dedicated virtual world to support their range of titles, due to go live<br />
 in June 2011.</p>
<p>
<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">That’s<br />
 all folks!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold"><br />
</span></span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulk/" rel="cc:attributionURL">http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulk/</a>  / <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="license">CC BY<br />
2.0</a></span></div>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40/" class="more-link">Read more on eModeration&#8217;s Social Media Round-Up #40&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/emoderation-s-social-media-round-up-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eModeration&#8217;s Social Round-up #37</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tia Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Fan Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online social media campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media round-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/tiafisher/archive/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160;<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">Welcome<br />
 to eModeration&#8217;s round-up of all that is intriguing, alarming or odd in<br />
 the world of social media, compiled by Kate Williams. For more social<br />
media snippets, follow her on @emodkate &#8211; or for general twittery,<br />
@KateVWilliams.&#160;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">This<br />
week: This week: judges can Google; the Conservative&#8217;s Great Social<br />
Media Adventure; and marketing on Chatroulette… in Lycra.  Plus: we&#8217;d<br />
still love your feedback on these updates: tweet Yay! or Boo! to<br />
@emodkate. It&#8217;ll take ten seconds, promise.</span>&#160;</span></p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=711680963096432046" title="headlines" class="" name="headlines">THE HEADLINES &#8230;</a></b></p>
<p>So: after months of tossing and turning; of agonized grimaces and broken<br />
 nights, Google has finally pulled the tooth that was ailing it, and <a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/google-to-leave-china-on-april-10/story-e6frfro0-1225843068980">quit<br />
 China</a>: an April 10 pullout is mooted. In an effort to continue<br />
offering uncensored results to its Chinese users (and not at all to<br />
cling on to the revenue potential attached to 800 million Chinese<br />
internet users  – don’t be ridiculous), Google began <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-23/google-faces-no-hong-kong-censors-after-china-retreat.html">redirecting<br />
 users</a> to their uncensored Hong Kong site, announcing that they’d be<br />
 ‘carefully monitoring access issues’.</p>
<p>Sure enough, the Chinese government <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/3eATWXbtxw8/">began<br />
 disabling</a> certain search results, and China’s national mobile<br />
provider <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8587026.stm">dropped<br />
 Google</a> as its default search engine. Chinese netizens found<br />
themselves back where they first began: censored.  But to be perfectly<br />
frank, they don’t seem <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7500762/Little-sympathy-for-Google-among-Chinese-over-censorship-row.html">all<br />
 that fussed</a>.  China’s increasingly affluent middle class have, till<br />
 now, been avid Googlers; but even amongst this key constituency there<br />
was little sympathy for Google’s position, with many, according to the<br />
Telegraph, feeling that the company had been disrespectful of local<br />
mores, a feeling <a href="http://www.bigmouthmedia.com/live/articles/google-move-divides-users-in-mainland-china.asp/6852/">even<br />
 more pronounced</a> amongst ‘mainstream’ Chinese. So when, for a short<br />
while on Tuesday morning, Google’s corporate pages were  displayed in<br />
Chinese, <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/uH_n03dWwAo/">many<br />
cried ‘hack’</a> &#8211; despite Google’s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/pda/2010/mar/24/google-hack-chinese-corporate-site">protestations</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Dell and Go Daddy want to join <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7517291/Dell-and-Go-Daddy-threaten-to-follow-Google-out-of-China.html">the<br />
 Leavin’ Train</a>, with the latter telling a US Congress committee<br />
hearing that the company no longer had the stomach for<br />
domain-registrations in China, where new regulations now demand photo ID<br />
 from anyone registering a .cn domain.</p>
<p>But Westside, Google’s self-penned profile as ‘stout defender of<br />
internet freedoms’ is increasingly under scrutiny. Co-founder Sergey<br />
Brin’s Guardian interview, in which he positioned Google as Poster Corp.<br />
 for digital liberation whilst berating Microsoft for working within<br />
China’s rules, got <a href="http://searchengineland.com/so-now-google-thinks-everyone-should-care-about-chinese-censorship-38697">backs<br />
 a-bristling</a>: several commentators pointed out that this was<br />
Google’s own strategy until – ooh, three months ago?</p>
<p>Fred Teng in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-teng/the-grey-areas-between-go_b_512869.html">the<br />
 Huffington Post</a>, meanwhile, calls for tolerance for China, whose<br />
journey from feudal island to globally-connected digital nation has, he<br />
points out, been laudably swift.</p>
<p>There’s not many matters in this world upon which we can all agree – but<br />
 the proposition ‘Nestle’s week has been a bit &#8230;meh’ might, I suspect,<br />
 <a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/991636/NestlE-faces-Facebook-crisis-Greenpeace-rainforest-allegations/">be<br />
 one of them</a>.  Item: their Facebook page was targeted by Greenpeace.<br />
  Item: their response went from ‘placatory’ to ‘I’m deleting yo’<br />
account’, then dashed back to ‘I never meant to hurt you’ &#8211;  in what <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/socialmediabiz-feed/%7E3/QVMS_3QGvGM/nestle-facebook-fans-consider-yourself-embraced">felt<br />
 like moments</a>, with bystanders gazing on in open-mouthed horror. At<br />
the time of going to press, Nestle’s Facebook page was best described as<br />
 <a href="http://socialmediainfluence.com/2010/03/23/will-nestle-ever-reclaim-its-facebook-page-from-protesters/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Fcustomcom%2Fsocial_media_influence+%28Social+Media+Influence%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Reader">a<br />
 sit-in</a> &#8211; and this painful episode can’t fail to spotlight the huge<br />
variation in the quality of brands’ moderation policies.  Jake McKee has<br />
 some useful thoughts <a href="http://www.blogger.com/%20http://www.communityguy.com/7313/how-to-develop-robust-moderation-methodology/?dsq=41348511#comment-41348511">here</a><br />
 – upon which we were delighted to comment.</p>
<p>Brace yourselves &#8211; Facebook’s <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jc6V668_OQBUYnplspenpM8n835QD9EKTRD01">latest<br />
 privacy battle</a> could have huge implications for all UGC platforms,<br />
potentially shifting the responsibility for protecting personal privacy<br />
away from users, and onto social networks. European regulators are<br />
investigating whether the privacy of people whose photos and videos are<br />
posted on social networks is being habitually breached.</p>
<p>There’s been a deal of <a href="http://debate2010.telegraph.co.uk/debate?debate=a07A00000013WUXIA2">huffing<br />
 and puffing</a> about the upcoming ‘Social Media Election’, with <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8586008.stm">BBC<br />
journalists</a> explaining Twitter to social slowpokes, and expounding<br />
on how both parties are utilizing it to sway voters.  Facebook launched a<br />
 new page called <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/PublicRelations/News/991681/Facebook-enters-political-fray-Democracy-UK/">Democracy<br />
 UK</a>, where its posting news of a political nature for all and<br />
sundry to <a href="http://en-gb.facebook.com/democracyuk">comment upon</a>);<br />
 ITN hosted <a href="http://www.blogger.com/ITN%20hosted%20live%20online%20debate%20during%20their%20budget%20special%28moderated%20%3Cmodest%20cough%3E%20by%20our%20very%20own%20selves%29;%20and%20new%20tools%20for%20tracking%20party-political%20sentiment%20are%20being%20launched%20Left,%20Right%20and%20Centre">live<br />
 online debate</a> during their budget special; and new<br />
 tools for tracking party-political <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/march/uk-election-new-tool-tracks-party-political"><br />
 sentiment</a> &#8211; like <a href="http://www.yomego.com/">Yomego</a>&#8216;s,<br />
pictured here &#8211; are being launched Left, Right and Centre.</p>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S6zJ2X0aXVI/AAAAAAAAAS8/NlazXKoIoEI/s1600/yomego+tool.JPG"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_18qU4hBPqFI/S6zJ2X0aXVI/AAAAAAAAAS8/NlazXKoIoEI/s400/yomego+tool.JPG" border="0" width="400" height="141"/></a> </p>
<p>   The Tories were first out of the gate: it emerged<br />
that they were outpacing Labour on Facebook by a ‘connection’ <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/23/conservatives-friends-facebook">ratio<br />
 of two to one</a>. Alas, their social success went straight to their<br />
heads and, minded to build upon their initial victory, they launched a <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/willheaven/100030846/charlie-whelan-has-become-an-unwilling-guinea-pig-for-the-tories-online-team/">rather<br />
 snazzy Facebook campaign</a> which incorporated a Twitter feed of the<br />
hashtag #cashgordon.   Alas, opponents discovered that the feed was <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/meg/4453821027/sizes/l/">entirely<br />
unmoderated</a>, and took the opportunity to bombard the site with an<br />
awful lot of – how to put it? &#8211; brand-negative comments. Worse still,<br />
they discovered that the site didn’t strip html, allowing those<br />
less-than-positive reviews to really, you know, <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/DailyDigital/%7E3/rKYd4VHm-ak/">shine<br />
 out</a>. The website was removed later that day.</p>
<p>  Meanwhile, Gordon Brown has described <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/march/brown2019s-digital-vision-super-fast-broadband-and">‘superfast’<br />
 broadband</a> as the “electricity of the digital age”.  Outlining<br />
Labour&#8217;s plans, he promised ziptastic speeds for every citizen, as well<br />
as a webpage through which to manage their interactions with local<br />
government – a proposal which, according to the government, could slash<br />
billions from the public service budget, and generate a quarter of a<br />
million jobs.&#160;</p>
<p>  Best not to mention, then, the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/19/digital-bill-open-letter">ongoing<br />
 brouhaha</a> over the government’s plans for our digital future which,<br />
it must be said, are not meeting with unqualified support.     <b>&#160;</b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=711680963096432046" title="lowdown" class="" name="lowdown">THE LOWDOWN &#8230;</a></b>&#160;</p>
<p>  Following a tip-off from the FBI, French police<br />
arrested the man responsible for hacking <a href="http://www.blogger.com/%20http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100324/tc_afp/franceuscrimeinternettwitter_20100324182427">Barack<br />
 Obama’s Twitter account</a> late last year &#8211; then released him, after<br />
he claimed that, far from being a master-criminal, he’d simply guessed <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8586269.stm">the<br />
President’s password</a> (His birthday? “ThePrezz”? or [gulp].. “<span style="font-style: italic">password?</span>”). All rather embarrassing<br />
for the man they’re calling the first president of the digital age.&#160;</p>
<p>Then, in an intriguing instance of plot-thickening, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/%20http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_hacker_document_leaker_arrested_in_france.php">ReadWriteWeb<br />
 revealed </a>unconfirmed reports that the hacker was the very same<br />
bounder who leaked Twitter’s confidential business plans to TechCrunch,<br />
who chose to publish them, despite a flurry of controversy.&#160;</p>
<p>Truth is, there’s not much in digital life that can<br />
truthfully be called ‘secure’ – this was the takeaway from the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/25/iphone-firefox-safari-ie8-hacked/">annual<br />
 Pwn2Own contest</a> at the CanSecWest security show, which challenges<br />
hackers (sorry, ‘security experts’) to break into a roster of everyday<br />
devices and software. This year, the scallywags succeeded in hacking<br />
into nearly every major browser (Safari, Firefox and IE8), as well as<br />
stealing the entire SMS database of a non-jailbroken iPhone.</p>
<p>    Eew. Director of Public Health Peter Kelly this<br />
week claimed that the rise of social networking has produced <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/n7jiEZSaK_w/">an<br />
alarming spike</a> in reported cases of syphilis. Sites like Facebook,<br />
he said, were “making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex,”<br />
and several of the syphilis cases he’d seen “had met sexual partners<br />
through these sites.” Facebook, understandably keen to quash the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7519772/Facebook-dismisses-syphilis-link.html">‘ridiculous’<br />
 idea</a>, pointed out that correlation is not <span style="font-style: italic">quite</span> the same as causation. Nevertheless – yikes.&#160;</p>
<p> Ah, hindsight is always 20:20; foresight &#8211; not so<br />
much.  All the more impressive, then, is <a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/22/for-sale-a-million-dollar-ipad-address/">the<br />
 inspired guess</a> made by Nik Tyler, who a year ago registered three<br />
domain names: ipaddownload.com, ipaddownloads.com and ipaddownloads.net.<br />
 They are now on the market; a million bucks will snag all three.&#160;</p>
<p>You have your lycra tiger-suit ready?  And your scary<br />
clown-mask? Good, then we’ll begin our ‘Marketing on Chatroulette’ 101,<br />
as taught by <a href="http://www.stagetwoconsulting.com/wordpress/10-essential-tips-for-marketing-your-brand-on-chatroulette-1197/">Stage<br />
 Two Consulting</a>. They advise marketing execs wishing to explore the<br />
potential of the latest social craze to “have several masks/outfits<br />
available in case the occasion arises.” Bless.</p>
<p>  Facebook’s <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/march/facebook-graph-reveals-days-when-brits-are">Gross<br />
 National Happiness Index</a> has landed in the UK, revealing the<br />
emotional ineptitude of the average Brit in all its glory &#8211; we are, it<br />
seems, only really free with our emotions in the matter of family, TV<br />
and the Weather. Disappointingly, the Index focuses on extremes of<br />
emotion –  happiness, or sadness – and so fails to track those<br />
sentiments which, in my experience, are most frequently demonstrated by<br />
we Brits:  ‘mild annoyance’, ‘qualified enthusiasm’, and<br />
‘schadenfreude’.&#160;</p>
<p>This is genuinely rather impressive – Franklin Page, a<br />
fleet-of-thumb employee of text-software company Swype, has beaten the<br />
World Record for texting at speed: you can watch and marvel <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#38;art_aid=124767">here</a>.<br />
  Huzzah – the astonishing and bizarre viral clip of a <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/rKN3XnB31i8/">Russian<br />
 lounge singer</a> warbling something called ‘Trololo’ has been given<br />
it’s own iPhone app! If you’ve not yet had the pleasure, do take a look:<br />
 you will be tickled pink, or horribly disturbed – one or t’other.   <b>&#160;</b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3945065&#38;postID=711680963096432046" title="newsbytes" class="" name="newsbytes">NEWSBYTES &#8230;</a></b>&#160;</p>
<p>Online dating is now so mainstream an activity that<br />
it’s now bigger than the online adult industry, and is worth a humungous<br />
 one billion dollars per year, according to this <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/24/online-dating-infographic/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Reader">new<br />
 infographic</a> from Online Schools.</p>
<p>   A US federal appeals court <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62L3ZG20100322">has ruled</a><br />
 that a judge who is unsure about a matter of common knowledge may use<br />
Google. Never again will a member of the bench be flummoxed by the name<br />
of a popular beat combo.   &#160;</p>
<p><a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/25/bmo-ups-its-ipad-sales-estimate-44/">Analysts<br />
 are predicting</a> that Apple will bite 40% of the tablet and e-reader<br />
market this year, sending shares zooming. And the iPad is already<br />
attracting high-end and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/mar/25/ipad-advertising">big-name<br />
 advertisers</a> to its apps, causing ripples of relief to bloom<br />
throughout an anxious ad industry. The New York Times reporting that the<br />
 going rate is anywhere between $75,000 and $300,000, and adds that <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9kjbq5">it’s already sold</a> its first two<br />
months of post-launch inventory.&#160;</p>
<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Mashable/%7E3/XXwp9MXnD8E/">Schoolkids<br />
 in Japan</a> will be using Nintendo DS&#8217;s in class before the end of the<br />
 year, the education authorities there having spotted the platforms<br />
wealth of educational titles.&#160;</p>
<p> Global web use continues its <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/socialmediabiz-feed/%7E3/hYMo-wQPj1w/global-audience-spends-two-hours-more-a-month-on-social-networks-than-last-year">relentless<br />
 upward trajectory</a>, with users on average spending 5.5 hours on<br />
social networks last month – up more than two hours on the previous<br />
year’s figures.&#160;</p>
<p>New <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#38;art_aid=124666">data<br />
 from Hitwise</a> suggests that users who come to news sites via<br />
Facebook are more loyal than those who are directed by Google news.</p>
<p>  And finally, stop counting those Twitter stats. <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#38;art_aid=124665">New<br />
 research</a> finds very little correlation between Twitter counts and<br />
actual influence – so there.   <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">&#160;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">That’s all folks!</span> </span>   </p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37/" class="more-link">Read more on eModeration&#8217;s Social Round-up #37&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/03/26/emoderation-s-social-round-up-37/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
