<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wall Blog &#187; outrage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallblog.co.uk/tag/outrage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Social, marketing, media : blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media rants against Samantha Brick &#8211; but who is worth listening to?</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/04/04/social-media-rants-against-samantha-brick-but-who-is-worth-listening-to/</link>
		<comments>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/04/04/social-media-rants-against-samantha-brick-but-who-is-worth-listening-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom McCann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowd sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User generated content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social CRM agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testify digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=25920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2012/04/Shout-at-Samantha.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-25923" src="http://wallblog.co.uk/files/2012/04/Shout-at-Samantha.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="213" /></a>This past 24 hours have seen the latest Twitter storm come hurtling through the social media atmosphere, sweeping up thousands before it in a big stinky cloud of outrage and bile. Not for the first time, the catalyst for the disgust was the Daily Mail, this time an <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2124246/Samantha-Brick-downsides-looking-pretty-Why-women-hate-beautiful.html?ito=feeds-newsxml" target="_blank">article by Samantha Brick</a> about &#8220;the downsides to looking pretty&#8221;. Whether or not they are cynically doing this stuff on purpose (1.5 million hits on one article is pretty impressive) is open for debate, but yet again they prove the sheer monumental snowball that can be created on social media if you do enough to sufficiently create the avalanche. <span id="more-25920"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/04/04/social-media-rants-against-samantha-brick-but-who-is-worth-listening-to/" class="more-link">Read more on Social Media rants against Samantha Brick &#8211; but who is worth listening to?&#8230;</a></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/04/04/social-media-rants-against-samantha-brick-but-who-is-worth-listening-to/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/04/04/social-media-rants-against-samantha-brick-but-who-is-worth-listening-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
