<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From community management to community design: the Brick Lane effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/09/11/from-community-management-to-community-design-the-brick-lane-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/09/11/from-community-management-to-community-design-the-brick-lane-effect/</link>
	<description>Social, marketing, media : blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: #FI Week #8 #9 #10 #11: Long live community design &#124; French Ideas agency</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/09/11/from-community-management-to-community-design-the-brick-lane-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-32381</link>
		<dc:creator>#FI Week #8 #9 #10 #11: Long live community design &#124; French Ideas agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=31828#comment-32381</guid>
		<description>[...] you want to discover the Brick Lane effect, well, you can read Laurent&#8217;s post for The Wall!     Tags: community, community design, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you want to discover the Brick Lane effect, well, you can read Laurent&#8217;s post for The Wall!     Tags: community, community design, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/09/11/from-community-management-to-community-design-the-brick-lane-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-32365</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=31828#comment-32365</guid>
		<description>@Brant right we&#039;re in a war room btw at least 3 or 4 App worlds, trying to bundle us to an unique platform

The thing is that at the moment, most of the content publishers use these tools to better suit their users experience. My argument is not to say that FB is fab, but that we need to implement compass in our digital journeys, istd of monomaniac places...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brant right we&#8217;re in a war room btw at least 3 or 4 App worlds, trying to bundle us to an unique platform</p>
<p>The thing is that at the moment, most of the content publishers use these tools to better suit their users experience. My argument is not to say that FB is fab, but that we need to implement compass in our digital journeys, istd of monomaniac places&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant Emery</title>
		<link>http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/09/11/from-community-management-to-community-design-the-brick-lane-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-32355</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.hbpl.co.uk/wallblog/?p=31828#comment-32355</guid>
		<description>The idea of moving from destination to travel operator is a nice observation, but it clashes against several things: Facebook ask brands to link within facebook, twitter / linkedin / google are becoming walled gardens (again) - in Google&#039;s case they&#039;re only allowing users to share their content via G+. How very AOL of them. I agree with the assertion that viewing these social layers in this way, makes more sense to consumer journeys and experiences, but I feel it has idealistic aspects that the need for hard nosed profit growth negates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of moving from destination to travel operator is a nice observation, but it clashes against several things: Facebook ask brands to link within facebook, twitter / linkedin / google are becoming walled gardens (again) &#8211; in Google&#8217;s case they&#8217;re only allowing users to share their content via G+. How very AOL of them. I agree with the assertion that viewing these social layers in this way, makes more sense to consumer journeys and experiences, but I feel it has idealistic aspects that the need for hard nosed profit growth negates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
