Monthly Archives: May 2010

To login is to err – or how the Facebook API can smooth the on-ramp

A contact in the retail leisure sector recently asked me ‘Do customers really need to login to a restaurant site? Surely all they want to do is make a simple reservation’.

I was momentarily flummoxed. Our ‘less push, more pull’ philosophy, by implication puts the customer in control and by doing so encourages action. For retail leisure clients this means we provide the ability for customers to login to manage their brand relationship (including reservations, personal details, email marketing preferences), and whilst it’s a bit more hassle the first time they do it, for subsequent visits it means that the form time is reduced by over 50%.

Just consider the amount of data needed when making a reservation; personal details including name, age verification (if it’s a drinking establishment), phone and/or email and that’s over and above the details needed for the reservation itself; time, date, number of guests, any special requests.

What about emails though to manage everything? Consider this; I received an email from my local pub, run by Geronimo Inns, the eflyer said ‘email us to make an enquiry’ – I did and since then I haven’t heard anything back. My email is probably now long forgotten and I’m not chasing it up, and that’s the point, by having somewhere online where you can go and see the status of your relationship you can obtain reassurance that everything is being handled as you’d hope.

On reflection, the real issue my contact highlighted was the login process itself. Having to remember a password is annoying, people tend to forget their details and when they’re at the point of action they’re forced to do a password reset before they can proceed. Alternatively, people use the same password for every user account they have, negating the security of each site if one is hacked.

Who’s going to hack a restaurant website though? Well, whilst a retail leisure website may not hold any secure transaction data, a hacker could use the data obtained as a stepping stone to other nefarious activities. If the password is only 4 digits for example, then many people’s first thought is to use their bank pin code as it’s something that they’ll easily remember. If this account were hacked then the customer would potentially expose their address, email, phone number and bank code. It’s easy to see the implications of where this may lead.

Over the years there have been numerous attempts to overcome the login issue, from Microsoft Passport to Open ID. None however have reached the tipping point of mass take-up from people, because they’re yet another layer of hassle or are too reliant on a partisan third party to enjoy objectivity.

Facebook has now arrived on the scene and thrown their war chest into the ring. Whilst not appropriate for all, if you’re a brand that is targeting online conversant customers then it is likely that those customers will be registered. According to Facebook there are now 24.5 million Facebook users in the UK (http://cot.ag/ch23vp), whilst it’s safe to assume that not all of these accounts are active that’s still a lot of people using the one platform.

Using the Facebook API (Application Programming Interface) it’s possible to link an account at a website with a Facebook account. This means that when the customer visits your website they can login with their Facebook details, or if they’re already logged into Facebook that they’ll be automatically granted entry. The benefit of this is that customers are more likely to remember their Facebook account details as they login to it frequently. There is another option, whereby a customer when signing-up simply provides their Facebook account details, but this is a more dangerous path as it means that all emails to the customer are routed via Facebook who will add a footer to the message and may obstruct it should they feel fit.

If the job of a login process is to make it easier and friendlier for a customer to access the website then the Facebook API shows a lot of promise. Although there are the well commented upon privacy issues with Facebook, and future use of the API which whilst free now may not always be, it seems to me that the benefits are obvious; making it easier for customers to login, displaying greater integration with the leading social media platform and the ability to think beyond your website to the Semantic ‘joined-up’ web.

Future of social media as viewed by 150 senior UK marketers

ThAdd an Imagee IDM has a great report out with the views of 150 marketers on the opportunities and threats of social media as they see it. This is definitely worth a read. Read More »

Twitter profiles and the three second rule

 

This post first appeared on the eModeration blog on 18th May 2010

What do you think makes a good Twitter profile?
What makes you want to follow back? And what has you reaching for the
bucket?

Most mornings, sometime between about 10am – 11am, I’ll start clicking
through to see who my new Twitter followers are. I’m aiming to
give each profile a three second glance – then if it looks of interest, I
may click through to the website, follow, put them in a list, send them
a welcome tweet, even forward their details to other people who make
want to follow them too – which all takes a lot longer. But
essentially, a Twitter profile has that three second window to capture
my interest. I’m not being snobbish, or overly discerning – I’m just
busy, and I don’t get enough time to read the many interesting people I
follow at the moment.

I tweet for work (this is very important) and I’m British. (So is this.
There are appear to be enormous cultural differences on Twitter). So
… for me, here are some profile no-no’s:

 

- Purely personal Twitter profiles are out. I need to know what
company and, hopefully, website and blog you are associated with.
- Obviously stock-shot photographic backgrounds
- Great big customised extra information splashed about ME! ME! ME!
and MY BUSINESS WHICH COULD MAKE YOU MONEY ON THE INTERNET!
- I need a decent picture – not soft porn, preferably not a
cheeeeeeesy studio portrait. If it’s a bit quirky, that’s good.
- If you call yourself a guru or a social media expert, I’m gone. I
don’t much like entrepreneur either. And if you describe yourself as
making your money from social media I suspect you barely scrape a living
and probably upset a lot of people in the process. Harsh, but true.
- If you are a company logo, please tell me who is doing the tweeting -
if several people do, please initial your tweets. I can’t form a
relationship with a logo.
- Don’t boast. And some self-depreciative
humour goes down well with this cynical Brit.
- Mentioning your family at the end of your business description is
fine. In fact it’s good. I’m less keen to know your golf handicap, but
that’s just me.

And of course, I’ll look at some recent tweets to see what kind of
interest/education/amusement you can offer. These will turn me off
immediately:

- Pithy sayings by the famous
- Pithy saying by the unknown
- Song Lyrics
- Everything In Initial Caps And Even Worse If It’s Not Even The Title
Of An Article.
- Spam. Spam. Spam. Spam.
- All conversations between friends which I don’t understand and am
not interested in. And conversely, no conversation. The best Tweeters
have a mixture of conversational starters, passing on information and
gnomic responses to ‘friends’.
- Dodgy punctuation!!!!!! Andpeeple who cant spelll 2
 

I’m really conscious that I’m standing in a great big glass house
now (or should that be birdcage?), and you can come and throw great big
stones at my profile (@emoderation) if you like: I expect I deserve it. Even worse, I
really wanted to post up some choice profiles to illustrate my points
(oh, I have some beauties). But that would be mean and nasty to actual
people, so I’ve had to restrain myself.  It would be great to hear what
turns you off Tweeters though – and maybe you’ll feel more able to share
some of the goodies in your intray?

Image: Duane Hoffmann / msnbc.com

Google Zeitgeist: nothing stops internet billionaires sleeping like babies

Google chief executive Eric Schmidt didn’t seem to have a care in the world as he sat sipping a Diet Coke and nibbling on chocolate-covered peanuts during a press briefing at Google’s Zeitgeist conference yesterday. The reality is, however, that the search giant is in hot water after its Street View camera cars were caught spying on people’s internet usage.

Read More »

Brands believe Facebook far more effective than Twitter for getting message across

Facebook is the most effective social networking platform for brands to get their marketing messages across to consumers say 80% of companies, whereas Twitter’s “impersonalised web service” is considered effective by only 45% of brands, according to research.
Read More »

GQ sells 365 copies of its Apple iPad — or $1,091 in sales

The iPad is making its mark on magazine publishing – albeit a rather small one –according to figures release by GQ publisher Conde Nast. The glossies publisher announced that 365 people downloaded the December issue of GQ onto Apple’s latest must-have gadget. Read More »

Yahoo! pays $100m for Associated Content and plans to expand low cost media model globally

The world of low cost user generated media just got a major shot in the arm as Yahoo! agrees to pay $100m for the US based Associated Content, which produces cheap content (text, pictures and video), with plans to expand it globally. Cheap content looks to be coming this way soon. Read More »

Privacy fears threaten Facebook’s plans for world domination

Mark Zuckerberg might appear to be more affable geek than evil genius, but the Facebook founder’s masterplan to seize control of the web would make even the dastardliest Bond villain proud.

The social networking site, founded just six years ago, has leapfrogged Yahoo! to become the biggest publisher of display ads, serving 176.3bn banners to US users in the first quarter of 2010. Read More »

Facebook will hit 500 million users by June

It was only in February that it was being reported that Facebook was closing in on the 400 million user mark and it will now hit 500 million before the end of June. Read More »

New York Times will begin charging in January as Times goes next week

The New York Times has said it will begin charging for access to content on its website in January as this side of the Atlantic The Times gears up to put its paywall up next week hot on the heels of axing as many as 50 jobs. Read More »